Pennsylvania Physician Law and Finance Blog

Information for Pennsylvania Physicians

Temporary Fix for Physicians' Medicare Reimbursement

clock December 29, 2009 10:55 by author Dennis Hursh

Helpful information from the American Health Lawyers Association 

President Obama Signs Into Law a Temporary Fix
to Physicians' Medicare Reimbursement

By Jeffrey Moore**

On December 19, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 (H.R. 3326), into law, which freezes Medicare physician payments for two months, avoiding a 21% payment cut to physicians' Medicare reimbursement scheduled to go into effect
on January 1, 2010. The House previously approved H.R. 3326 on December 16, 2009, while the United States Senate passed H.R. 3326 on December 19, 2009.

Because the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010, is only a temporary fix to the Medicare physician payment issue, Congress will be forced to address this payment issue in early 2010, as the Medicare physician payment cuts are set to go back into effect on March 1, 2010.

**We would like to thank Jeffrey S. Moore, Esquire (Phelps Dunbar LLP, Tupelo, MS), for providing this email alert, and the Regulation, Accreditation, and Payment Practice Group for sharing this email alert with the Physician Organizations Practice Group.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2010 “Final” (?) Medicare Fee Schedule Released – 21.2% Reduction in Physician Fees

clock November 5, 2009 10:17 by author Dennis Hursh

Thanks to the American Bar Association’s Physician Interest Group for the following summary of the “final” Medicare Fee Schedule issued today.   

Unless Congress acts, the 21.2% statutorily mandated reduction of overall physician fees will be implemented effective January 1, 2010.  The “final” regulation contains the following provisions of particular interest to physicians:

 *          Eliminates the use of all consultation codes (inpatient andoffice/outpatient codes for various places of service except for telehealth consultation G-codes) on a budget neutral basis by increasing the work relative value units (RVUs) for new and established office visits, increasing the work RVUs for initial hospital and initial nursing facility visits, and incorporating the increased use of these visits into practice expense (PE) and malpractice RVU calculations.

*          Finalizes the proposal to remove physician-administered drugs from the definition of "physician services" for purposes of computing the physician update formula.  This long-awaited administrative step mitigates the size of future Medicare Part B reductions.

*          Phases in new PE RVUs over four years using revised survey data that will result in significant increases and decreases to the PE values of many codes.

*          Establishes a Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) reporting mechanism via qualified electronic health records.

*          Defines the size of a group practice as at least 200 providers for purposes of the new PQRI group-practice reporting option.

 *          Increases the utilization assumption for diagnostic equipment priced at more than $1 million, which will decrease the technical component payment for services performed on this equipment.  This change will be phased in over 4 years.    

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


More on the "doc fix" mess

clock October 29, 2009 06:36 by author Dennis Hursh

Thanks to NPR for this summary, which was reproduced by the American Health Lawyers Association

Congress is at an impasse over how to fix a perennial problem in Medicare.

Just about every year a formula glitch threatens to cut payments to doctors who treat seniors and the disabled. And just about every year Congress cancels the cut. This year lawmakers are complaining about the bill because it's not paid for. But, despite what both Republicans and Democrats are claiming, that's nothing new.

Permanent Fix Falls Short

Rather than do another one or two year patch for the Medicare doctor pay cut problem, Senate Democrats had wanted to fix the problem permanently. But their bill couldn't even make it to the Senate floor--it fell short on its first procedural test last Wednesday by 13 votes. The reason cited by virtually every opponent was that the bill's $250 billion, ten-year cost wasn't paid for with other spending cuts or increased taxes.

New Hampshire Republican Senator Judd Gregg is among the opponents of the bill. "We've only done yearly fixes in this area, the doctor fix, because it's a pretty difficult number to always pay for, but we have always paid for it," he said on CNN last Sunday.

Except that Congress hasn't always paid for it. In fact, when Republicans were in charge, they did cancel the Medicare cuts to doctors, but rarely paid for them. Just before turning control of Congress back to the Democrats at the end of 2006, Republicans actually tucked legislation to cancel the next year's doctor pay cut into a catch-all tax bill that wasn't paid for either. And then-Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg was one of the people who complained the loudest.

"You just have to ask yourself how we, as a party, got to this point, where we have a leadership which is going to ram down the throats of our party the biggest budget buster in the history of the Congress under Republican leadership," said Gregg back in 2006.

Bipartisan Memory Loss

But Republicans don't have a lock on short-term memory problems. Here's how White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded when he was asked about the issue last Thursday: "The cut in payments to doctors is something that is to be implemented every year; and gets fixed every year for the past six years. The president included in his budget fixing for and paying for that fix," said Gibbs.

Except Gibbs was only half-right. President Obama's budget does propose to fix the payment problem in that it would cancel next year's Medicare cut for doctors and cuts into the future. But it doesn't propose to pay for the added costs.

In fact, back in March, White House Budget Director Peter Orszag testified before a House Committee that the proposed fix could cause the federal deficit to be as much as $400 billion higher over the next decade.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Strange Bedfellows

clock October 22, 2009 10:09 by author Dennis Hursh

The uneasy alliance between the AMA and Senate Democrats is starting to look a bit frayed.  Apparently, Senator Reid took the “doc fix” legislation to a vote based on what he understood to be assurances from the AMA that there were enough Republican votes to get it through.

Oops.  Apparently, the AMA thought it made it clear that there were Republican votes for general health care reform legislation, NOT that particular piece of legislation.  The “doc fix” legislation went down in flames.

Stay tuned as the sitcom continues.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Senate Postpones Vote On Medicare "Doc Fix"

clock October 21, 2009 12:12 by author Dennis Hursh
Thanks to the American Health Lawyers for this summary, dated October 19, 2009.Senate Democrats have postponed a scheduled cloture vote today on a bill that would make permanent changes to scheduled rate cuts to Medicare reimbursement for doctors and hospitals. Meanwhile, doctors worry about the cuts and lawmakers worry that the fix could break budget goals.The New York Times Prescriptions Blog reports that the American Medical Association is broadcasting a new television commercial endorsing the Senate bill. "S. 1776 is a Senate bill that would permanently adjust a Medicare payment formula that for years has threatened to impose steep annual cuts in the rates that doctors are paid," according to the Times. "The formula, tracing to laws passed in 1989 and 1997, was devised to keep Medicare spending in check." In recent years, though, congressional lawmakers have intervened with a "patch, known on Capitol Hill as the annual 'doc fix,' to prevent the cuts." Currently, Democrats have no plans "to offset the cost of S. 1776, which is why they are eager to keep it separate from the broader health care legislation and avoid breaking the president's promise [that health reform would not add to the deficit]." They insist "fixing the doctor payment formula should not count toward the cost of the big health care legislation, because it is a problem they inherited. What they have trouble explaining, though, is how the flawed formula is different from any of the zillion other entrenched problems in the health care system that the proposed overhaul aims to fix" (Herszenhorn, 10/18). The Hill Blog reports on the decision to postpone today's vote: "Initially, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) scheduled his motion to end floor debate and bring the so-called 'doc fix bill' to a final vote at the beginning of next week. But the leader reportedly changed his mind on Friday, deciding instead to vitiate Monday's vote so both parties' lawmakers could broker an agreement on a few remaining amendments, his office said Sunday. Reid's office did not specify what those amendments might be, but Republicans have previously suggested they hoped to add pay-fors to the Democrats' bill in an attempt to reduce its $248-billion footprint . . . . Nevertheless, it is unclear when Democrats will attempt cloture next, but it could be as soon as later this week" (Romm, 10/18)

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Contact me

To contact Dennis Hursh, please click here

Sign in

Health Professionals Blog Directory